- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 08:47:07 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 07/06/2013 19:18, Maneesh Pangasa wrote: > That being said abandoning proprietary plugins for the open web was > the point behind developing HTML5. All stakeholders who design web > apps can code/write their apps once and they'll work across all > mobile platforms iOS, Android, Windows Mobile (Windows Phone, Windows > RT whatever Microsoft now calls it) whereas for native apps they have > to code separate apps for iOS, Android, Blackberry and Windows > devices and users can benefit from the open web. The reality, however, is that content owners currently want to have a modicum of "protection" for delivering their content in browser. Otherwise, they would simply opt to only allow their content to be delivered via proprietary native apps... > No one is asking us what > we want? Actually, as a user myself, if I'm given the choice between a) not being able to get content in browser because content owners don't fancy sending their stuff as raw MP4/WebM/etc for playback inside <video>, instead having to use native apps for each provider, or b) being able to get content, although it relies on a DRM layer that relies on installed CDMs (much in the same way that even delivery of non-DRMd video in browser depends on either the OS having the correct video codec installed or the browser having baked-in support for it - with the consequences we already saw relating to MP4 and FOSS) then, as a user, I'd go with the second option. Yes, I could also try and make a stand about how DRM is ineffective, how it won't combat real piracy, how it's incompatible with free open ideologies...but - as was already suggested a while ago on this subject - those discussions would be best served on public-html-media mailing list, not here (and only if they actually contribute anything new to the topic, rather than just being another ideological stand-off). P -- Patrick H. Lauke ______________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com | http://flickr.com/photos/redux/ ______________________________________________________________ twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke ______________________________________________________________
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 07:47:32 UTC