Re: proposal to explicitly forbid <small> use as subheadings from Leif Halvard Silli on 2013-06-07 (public-html@w3.org from June 2013)

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:59:02 +0200
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20130607145902857626.aaf78cc4@xn--mlform-iua.no>

Steve Faulkner, Fri, 7 Jun 2013 13:49:57 +0100:
> On 7 Jun 2013, at 13:23, Leif Halvard Silli  wrote:
>> Steve Faulkner, Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:05:52 +0100:

> I don't believe the discussion has concluded. I also believe that we 
> don't have consensus on how small should be used.

I have not observed any debate about <small> that was delinked from the 
issue of subheadings. But I can understand if you want to postpone 
deciding about Ian’s proposal until the subheadings issue has been 
solved.
-- 
leif halvard silli

Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 12:59:31 UTC