- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 14:23:44 +0200
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Steve Faulkner, Fri, 7 Jun 2013 10:05:52 +0100: > but we need to decide if the "must not" requirement on use of <small> is an > appropriate conformance requirement for HTML? What we discussed with regard to <small>, can be described as an attempt to *add* - eventually “find” - subheading semantics to <small>. However, there were no recorded result from the discussion. As such, Ian’s proposal to explicitly declare <small> as unpermitted for the purpose of subheadings, should be uncontroversial. It is worth pointing out that he does not say that small is forbidden as child of h1-h6 - he only says that it is forbidden for the purpose of subheadings. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 12:24:14 UTC