- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:36:59 +1000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Removing the other lists, because cross-posting is discouraged. On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> That's a fair observation and right now each file format (in >> particular WebVTT) provides for all the semantics through the same >> internal markup. I suppose we can continue creating more WebVTT cue >> settings and markup for all cue kinds for a while before we create >> something that creates a problem. Also, there is not currently a >> specification of a different cue JS object (such as TTMLCue). So, >> let's cross that bridge when we get to it. > > > We are already at that bridge. There is an early draft specification of a > TTMLCue in [1], with editing actions assigned to begin bringing this into > TTML2 ED. There is also development work underway to implement this > functionality in multiple browsers. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/wiki/TTML/changeProposal006 Well, this proposal actually confirms the browser feedback that the different file formats need different APIs and should not be grouped by semantics. Thanks for sharing. Regards, Silvia.
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 04:37:46 UTC