- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 22:23:39 +0000
- To: "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Hi Ted, >This change would also bring our definition of > <main> more in line with the definition of <main> in the WHATWG spec, > and convergence is definitely a good thing. convergence is good if what we are converging on is based on solid use cases and data. I have not seen anything evidence or data to support the specification of <main> in the form it is in the WHATWG spec. Have you? regards SteveF On 31 January 2013 21:22, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > You wrote: > >> It would be handy to be able to explicitly mark up the main content of >> an article or an aside—for exactly the same reasons that it would be >> useful to mark up the main content of a document. >> >> So why not? > > Sounds reasonable to me. This change would also bring our definition of > <main> more in line with the definition of <main> in the WHATWG spec, > and convergence is definitely a good thing. > > > Ted >
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 22:24:46 UTC