- From: Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:56:32 +0000
- To: Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com>
- Cc: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 17:57:02 UTC
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Jeremy Keith <jeremy@adactio.com> wrote: > Cameron wrote: > > You will not achieve parity if an element is misused to the point that > it can no longer be relied upon. > > I don't think you're grasping what I'm getting at: using main within > sectioning content other than the body element wouldn't be a *misuse*, it > would simply be *another* use. Just like using footer within sectioning > content isn't a misuse; it's perfectly acceptable …but only the footer > element that is scoped to the body carries the same meaning as > role="contentinfo". It could be the same for main: use the main element > scoped to the body (where it means role="main") but go ahead and use it in > other sectioning content too …but in those cases, it won't map to > role="main". > > But what is the main-main content of the page then? I need to direct accessibility users to the "main" content of the *whole* page. How can that be determined if there are more than one of them? That definition is also against the ARIA specification and also distinctly stated is *not* the aim nor purpose of the element. Thanks, Cameron Jones
Received on Thursday, 31 January 2013 17:57:02 UTC