- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:35:28 +0000
- To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.co.uk>
another question is whether using a list would be useful/helpful? Leonie? as a list provides a set size and ability to skip over it or drill into nested lists if present etc. Or are list semantics too verbose? <h2> Two comments</h2> <ol> <li>lol <li>u SUK </ol> regards SteveF On 23 January 2013 13:06, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 12:52:43 -0000, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.co.uk> wrote: > >> >> When article elements are nested, the inner article elements represent >> self-contained compositions that are related to the contents of the outer >> article. For instance a website that features book reviews could represent >> an image of a book cover and its cover text as an article, nested within >> the >> article element for the book review. > > > Is there a reason for any semanric to describe a comment, though? does > anyone benefit from > > <article> > <h1>My wonderful Mankini</h1> > There's only one letter difference between "mankini" and "mankind". > > <h2> Two comments</h2> > > <article>lol</article> > <article>u SUK</article> > > </article> > > over > > <article> > <h1>My wonderful Mankini</h1> > There's only one letter difference between "mankini" and "mankind". > > <h2> Two comments</h2> > > <div>lol</div> > <div>u SUK</div> > > </article> > > ? >
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 13:36:36 UTC