- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:44:03 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 22/01/13 22:26, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote: >>> I am about to release BlueGriffon 1.6 so this is clearly too late for >>> this version. >>> So, if for 1.7, I add a "Polyglot" checkbox to the New Document dialog >>> in the case of html5 (xml serialization), will you consider BlueGriffon >>> as an implementation? That checkbox would strip the xml declaration from >>> the document serialization on save or PUT. >> >> I would definitely propose it to this WG as a polyglot implementation >> then! > > Yes, it seems this could clearly qualify as an independent implementation. Ok. In my own builds, I just added readonly attribute bool hasXMLDeclaration; to Document.idl; that seems the minimal change required to support polyglot so le me try an implementation. Please don't discuss the quality of that change, it's only a test. It is clearly not enough for full XML support that require to put back xmlEncoding, xmlVersion and xmlStandalone. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2013 10:44:29 UTC