Re: TAG Decision on Rescinding the request to the HTML WG to develop a polyglot guide

Henri Sivonen, Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:16:22 +0200:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote:

> I think users of BlueGriffon would get more value if you focused on
> the editing features and didn’t sink time into polyglot.
   [ . . . ]
>> Since an
>> editor like mine can edit all flavors of html, it still needs to
>> output the xml declaration for xhtml
> Not if you always output XML as UTF-8, which you should, since UTF-16
> makes no sense for interchange and UTF-8 is the only other encoding
> guaranteed by XML to be supported.
> I think the best solution would be to ignore polyglot and not support
> it, though. Then it’s OK to emit the XML declaration in XML.

Daniel, my personal preference would be that authors would have to 
*uncheck* [x] Polyglot so that BlueGriffon would default to creating 
HTML-conforming XHTML5.  And this also seems to be what Henri wants 
when he puts aside all the points he wants to make first.
leif halvard silli

Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 23:19:03 UTC