- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel@glazman.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:24:04 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
On 22/01/13 09:55, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Don't support polyglot. Problem solved. I will support what I think is best for the Web, like I have always done during the last 22 years, thanks. > That polyglot is eating your development time like this is evidence > that publishing the polyglot guide is not harmless. You know what is _really_ eating my development time? Some people seem to have a undisclosed plan to just kill XML wherever it lives, ignoring the reality of the industries out here in the name of some sort of logical purity. Some of these people have worked for software implementors but never for software users. They say they know but they don't. When I see the xml declaration is still used by zillions and Gecko has no more OM way of reaching it, _that_ does eat my development time. When I see editing in contenteditable elements and designMode documents is specified ONLY trying to harmonize what browsers currently do w/o looking at what users need and by people who are NOT Masters of html editing rules, _that_ eats my development time. When a Working Group prefers keeping <ins> and <del> that CANNOT work instead of switching to a modern, robust AND IMPLEMENTED-BY-EVERYONE solution, that does eat my development time. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 09:24:33 UTC