- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:59:26 +0100
- To: 'Henri Sivonen' <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>, lrosenth@adobe.com, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
> I think requiring XHTML is the least of EPUB’s problems when it comes > to author ergonomics. Henri, with all due respect, you probably have carefully read the EPUB specs but I'm not sure you are well aware of what is the software production chain in the publishing industry... Using an XML model is far more important than you think because it gives EPUB authors the ability to do a first trivial validation on the elements contained in a document instance w/o having to call an expensive (in terms of time) validator. All IDEs out there are able to tell you if you miss an end tag, or if your attributes are faulty and that's already a bit of something, trivially implemented. > The main annoyances are needless indirection (Why do you need to be > able to locate the OPF wherever you want and have a pointer to it in a > well-known location? Why aren't you just put the OPF in the well-known Because EPUB is based on the assumption a reader may have no knowledge and even no visibility of a filesystem, mimetypes, and such. The OPF and its manifest then serve as a central declaration point for all things found in the package. Yeah, that can be seen as painful; it can also be seen as a savior by low-end devices. > location?), the dependency on an XML vocabulary even worse than OPML > (NCX), the requirement to declare various things that the reading NCX is obsoleted in EPUB 3. > system could easily inspect itself and cache for later use (e.g. > whether a given file uses scripting or has MathML) and reinventing Because parsing a potentially VERY long document just to know if it contains script is a too expensive operation when the user is waiting for its UI to present something. And if a given ebook reader does not implement JS, you need to know it right away to let the user know he/she may miss something in the document... I agree this is not ideal. The world is not ideal. I agree EPUB 3 solution for the scripted and mathml properties is a compromise probably needed by some ebook readers. > ways to express many things that HTML can already express (stating > book title and authorship without XHTML <title> and <meta > name=author>, declaring the order of XHTML files using <spine> instead > of <link rel=next> in the files themselves). I am probably the only one in the world who implemented EPUB 3 metadata authoring _fully_ . EPUB 3 metadata are incredibly powerful, probably too powerful but the thing I know is that their power is currently impossible to express in html. Same thing for the relationships between document instances in the package. > The annoyances mentioned in the previous paragraph make EPUB authoring > by hand is terrible enough that you need a tool, and once you have a > tool you might as well throw HTML to XHTML conversion into the tool. Please define "tool" here? You mean a specialized app with knowledge of the xml dialects used by EPUB or a generic editing tool with XML knowledge, for instance emacs or eclipse? </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2013 08:59:57 UTC