- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:25:39 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>, "www-tag@w3.org List" <www-tag@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> * that there are implementations that support >> generating polyglot documents > > > Potential candidates: Planet Venus and Wunderbar. > > http://www.intertwingly.net/code/venus/ > https://github.com/rubys/wunderbar Even if two implementations written by the same person are independent in the sense that they don't share lines of code, they are not independent in the sense that they'd demonstrate that the spec is clear enough that two different people reading it end up writing interoperable software. For that reason, I think citing these two implementations as the two independent interoperable implementations would fail at least the spirit if not the letter of the Process requirement. (Of course, you could cite one of the above and a third piece of software written by someone else.) -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 12:26:08 UTC