Re: HTML6

I’m intrigued by what this proposal does really add to (X)HTML. To me, it seems you can simply use it already as a valid XHTML document (using a custom namespace and eventually with an XSL stylesheet to convert <media type="..."> & <link type="..." /> into <img />, <video />, <audio /> and <script /> where needed). But maybe I’m wrong.

From: Glenn Adams 
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 3:58 PM
To: Oscar Godson 
Cc: public-html@w3.org 
Subject: Re: HTML6

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Oscar Godson <oscargodson@outlook.com> wrote:

  I wasn't going to submit this but I've actually received quite a few people saying they want me to, so I was wondering where I'd submit a proposal / concept I did? Link here: http://html6spec.com/

You should first rename it to something other than HTML6. Whatever HTML6 will be, it will be defined by the W3C. I would suggest you rename your proposal to something like "Semantic markup extensions for HTML5", etc.

Regards,
Glenn