- From: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:42:44 +0000
- To: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 10:43:11 UTC
On 4 January 2013 03:14, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>wrote: > An author is expected to know whether I would prefer to download a > resource or simply open it normally. This strikes me as unlikely. > Really? That depends what the link's content says. A "Download this wallpaper" link resulting in downloading an image instead of opening it in the browser would not astonish most users. In fact, it would help a lot of users that are unaware of the alternatives to just clicking links. The use case offered in this thread essentially suggests defining the user > interface of browsers - which is often not a good idea, and has therefore > generally been avoided. > I thought the use case was for content authors that would like the Content-Disposition behaviour, but do not have the level of control of the server required to implement it (or the skills). > I don't recall reading the discussion > Me neither! -- Lee
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 10:43:11 UTC