- From: Ian Devlin <ian@iandevlin.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:12:16 +0100
- To: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 09:12:40 UTC
Hi Michael, Their location doesn't really matter to me, but perhaps if they were somewhere more prominent then it might help others. Ian On 12 February 2013 09:58, Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Ian, > > > @2013-02-12 09:51 +0100: > > To be honest I wasn't really aware of either of them but now that I see > > them I'm likely to use them in the future if they're maintained. > > > > HTML: The Markup Language seems perfect for people who want to know the > > difference between HTML 4.01 and HTML5 and I would direct them there. > > > > HTML5: Edition for Web Authors is better for pointing people to as it > > ignores all the UA stuff. I could have used this yesterday for a HTML5 > > Doctor article I was writing and in fact I'm going to change the link in > > that article to this version as it's a lot more relevant. > > > > So, no, I haven't used them, but I will in the future (depending on their > > future!) > > So maybe another question to ask is, do you think you and others you know > would be more likely to use them (and to find them to begin with) if they > were provided somewhere other than at http://www.w3.org/TR/foo ? > > --Mike > > -- > Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike > -- ian devlin e: ian@iandevlin.com w: www.iandevlin.com t: @iandevlin <http://www.twitter.com/iandevlin> skype: idevlin buy my book: html5 multimedia: develop and design<http://html5multimedia.com>
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 09:12:40 UTC