- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:55:27 +0100
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+VkSgk6ZvXuvbYP=vmGqDzUTJf7Mh9dz=o7pmiR0PHPW+Q@mail.gmail.com>
some details: new (proposed): http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element old: http://www.w3.org/TR/html51/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element change based on: - https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22996 (note: am not closing bug as this discussion has some time to run yet) - http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2013/on-citing-quotations-again/ - http://oli.jp/2011/blockquote/ - http://html5doctor.com/blockquote-q-cite/ - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Aug/0100.html and related question: Is the change backwards compatible? i.e. does it break anything? data appears to show that metadata about a quote inside blockquote element is common > ”inside blockquote” was used 57% of the time, while > “outside blockquote” was used 43% of the time. > > source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013Aug/0100.html -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> On 29 August 2013 07:53, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I have made a change in the HTML 5.1 editors draft to allow citations to > be included in a footer element within a blockquote element. > > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-blockquote-element > > > review and comment welcome! > -- > > Regards > > SteveF > HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/> >
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2013 08:56:35 UTC