- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:59:49 +0300
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org >> HTMLWG WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote: > Just for the record in that discussion about definition of `cite` element (not the attribute) Also: # [22:43] <DanC> the meaning of <cite> has drifted significantly since I added it to HTML. It was introduced via TeXinfo from, but it goes back to the chicago manual of style. It's for marking up titles of works. # [22:43] <DanC> that is: it was originally for marking up titles of works. # [22:44] <DanC> I was asleep at the wheel when the <cite>Romeo</cite>... <cite>Juliet</cite>... examples got added to HTML4 http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20070402#l-333 -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@hsivonen.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 14:00:17 UTC