- From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:32:50 +0100
- To: Heydon Pickering <heydon@heydonworks.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On 15 August 2013 17:17, Heydon Pickering <heydon@heydonworks.com> wrote: > I'm not at all convinced about the use of <cite> as a means of attribution > for quotations. The <cite> element is already notoriously misunderstood > and it would take a specification change just to make it an applicable > element. This is even before we begin to cludge together the relationship > between > <blockquote> and <cite>. I'd always used <blockquote> <p>Lawks a lawdy, my bottom's on fire!</p> <cite>Joan of Arc</cite> </blockquote> but Hixie was adamant that HTML5 shouldn't be backwardsly compatible with HTML4, which allowed names as well as works to be <cite>d. But as no conformance checker can check it, and I find the restriction unnecessary, I continue to use this pattern,
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 16:33:20 UTC