On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Jerry Smith (WINDOWS) <
jdsmith@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Silvia;****
>
> ** **
>
> I’ve looked at the specs for TextTrackCue and WebVTTCue. They are quite
> different. I’d like to confirm some aspects of this proposed change:****
>
> ** **
>
> **- **It makes TextTrackCue an abstract interface, but preserves
> the existing TextTrackCue object for compatibility – correct?
>
Not so much for compatibility, but rather to provide a generic interface to
all format-specific TextTrackCue objects that implementers can rely on.
> Does that suggest TextTrackCue is a base implementation and WebVTTCue a
> proposed variant?’
>
Yes.
> ****
>
> **- **How will the WebVTTCue affect implementation of the track
> element itself? The details of it appear to require changes beyond the que
> object itself. If it does, that does not seem a proper way to evolve a
> standardized element.
>
I don't understand. There are no other changes FAIK. Can you explain what
you mean?
Thanks,
Silvia.