- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:41:12 +1000
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 06:43:12 UTC
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>wrote: > hi silvia, > > > * Restrict <main> from having <aside>, <footer>, <header>, or <nav> > ancestors (7817) > https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/92a5ab6d36b3db8b655f88d080779bfd0f8b56a3 > > doesn't look like this was applied and ask that it not be applied as the > contexts in which main can be used are already defined in html 5.1 and the > rules are implemented the validator, > It's in nightly, so just staged for publication. This is why I do these cherry-picks - I can always revert them. However, I have a question. This repeating information that is defined in the <main> element. Why is that so bad to repeat it? In my view, it makes it easier for an author to find this information. Thanks, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 06:43:12 UTC