- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:25:08 +1000
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 04:25:56 UTC
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer < > silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> * Introduce TextTrackKind and add more IDL support to TextTrack API. >> (7808) >> >> >> https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/9683aedef55f016ff5ebe44fe5c942604774c840 >> > > What is the motivation for changing text track kind from a DOMString to an > enumerated type? Enumerated types are much harder to evolve/maintain. This > seems like a bad idea. > > >From my POV: It makes it harder for authors to make an error in @kind, since validators can check for valid values. However, you might want to ask Ian directly about his motivation for this change. The relevant bug is at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21657 Thanks, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 18 April 2013 04:25:56 UTC