RE: [HTMLWG] Decision: Adopt "Plan 2014" with modifications and make some specific related decisions from John Foliot on 2012-10-16 (public-html@w3.org from October 2012)

From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:15:33 -0700
To: "'Silvia Pfeiffer'" <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: <public-html@w3.org>, "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <01dc01cdabf4$26862d70$73928850$@ca>

Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> 
> I would also prefer we called the spec HTML 5.0, because HTML5 stands
> for the whole idea of new Web technologies. It would be preferable if
> the HTML spec - which is just a part of that idea - had a more
> explicitly identifiable name. It also indicates that there will be a
> 5.1 etc, which signals that this time around we won't get stuck with
> an aging spec.

+1

JF

Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 23:16:09 UTC