- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:02:03 +0100
- To: Mathew Marquis <mat@matmarquis.com>
- CC: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 02/10/2012 02:47 , Mathew Marquis wrote: > There’s a great deal of overlap between this proposal and the current > `picture` proposal ( > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-proposals/raw-file/tip/responsive-images/responsive-images.html ), > though `picture` does involve a portion of the `srcset` > functionality. How do we best address this? Should the Responsive Images > Community Group prepare a change proposal based on the WHATWG draft, or > should we hold off for the time being? I wouldn't worry about merging those just yet — at this point I think it is more important to try to reach agreement on how this works. The actual text wrangling can follow > We’re putting together a comprehensive list of use case comparisons — > how each pattern might address some of the use cases we’ve nailed down — > and I’d like to see proponents of the `srcset` pattern contribute to > this as well: > https://github.com/Wilto/draft-prop/blob/master/UseCaseComparisons.md I think that this would be very useful indeed. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 12:02:16 UTC