W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Formal Objections on REC-track status of polyglot and alt-techniques

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:30:06 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJQvAucsWRqHufVup2Y4uusbdEx+SWizA7spZ-cmAyHias2m4A@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> At the time we discussed Note track vs REC at TPAC, I did not mention anything about withdrawing Formal Objections, temporarily or otherwise.  I simply did not think about it.
> After thinking about it and discussing, I've concluded that it would be better to have a Working Group Decision before having a Formal Objection, for the sake of process clarity. It may not seem effective to ask for objections to be fully withdrawn that may be reinstated. So I'd like to ask you guys if you are willing to make your Formal Objections to polyglot and alt-techniques being on the REC track conditional, specifically on the Working Group actually deciding to go to CR with these documents[*].
> [*] To pre-emptively address potential worries: if WG decides to proceed with these documents on the REC track, this approach will still result in your Formal Objections being forwarded to the Director to consider as part of the CR transition and will not prejudice them in any way.

Works for me.

Henri Sivonen
Received on Friday, 30 November 2012 16:30:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:58 UTC