W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Statement why the Polyglot doc should be informative

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:08:26 -0800
Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>, Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
Message-id: <DE04675C-818C-4982-BB00-E7037F4DA74B@apple.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>

On Nov 27, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 11/09/2012 10:30 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>>> Whatever might have been said or what you might
>>> have thought you heard,
>> I donít appreciate discrediting my listening comprehension en passant.
> I wasn't present, but the meeting minutes do not reflect any statement that work on the Rationale was to be done *instead* of following the documented process:
> http://www.w3.org/2012/11/02-html-wg-minutes.html#item12
> Perhaps it wasn't captured.  Perhaps all the necessary people weren't in the room.  In any case, it is a clear policy of this working group that decisions are not made off-list.

I think the minutes may not adequately reflect what was discussed. I have now marked the relevant existing bugs as TrackerRequest, based on Henri and Lachlan's clearly stated intent in the 2f2. I hope this puts us on track to correctly following the documented process.

Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 10:08:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:58 UTC