Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

I support this CFC with the caveat that the issues around the alt text
requirements are resolved at some point before REC.



On 14 November 2012 22:15, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> In accordance with both the W3C process's requirement to record the
> group's decision to request advancement[1], and with the steps identified
> in the "Plan 2014" CfC[2], this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to request
> transition to CR for the following document:
>
> http://htmlwg.org/cr/html/**index.html<http://htmlwg.org/cr/html/index.html>
>
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive
> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Monday,
> November 26th, this resolution will carry.
>
> Considerations to note:
>
> - A request to advance indicates that the Working Group believes the
> specification is stable and appropriate for implementation.
>
> - The specification MAY still change based on implementation experience.
>
> - Sam Ruby, on behalf of the W3C co-chairs
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/**Process-20051014/tr.html#**transition-reqs<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs>
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-html/2012Oct/**0026.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Oct/0026.html>
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html