- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 17:30:59 +0200
- To: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Whatever might have been said or what you might > have thought you heard, I don’t appreciate discrediting my listening comprehension en passant. > I will once again state that the process is quite > clear that the next step after the editors initial decision is indeed a bug > report: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec It seems hard to work with this group if a participant can’t trust the word of two out of three chairs that steps of a procedure have been waived. I should have followed my instinct to do everything according to the written procedure anyway: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19923 -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 15:31:33 UTC