- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:38:31 -0800
- To: "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>
I support this proposal. JF > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Ruby [mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net] > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 11:53 AM > To: HTML WG (public-html@w3.org) > Subject: [HTMLWG] CfC: Create a Mailing List for administrative matters > and notifications? > > On 10/22/2012 03:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > > > I've heard from some that the major objection to using public-html > for > > certain technical discussions is not so much the other technical > > discussion, so much as administrative matters that are considered > noise. > > Specifically, the things I have heard cited are bugzilla new bug > > notifications, and CFCs and other "call" type emails. How would folks > > feel about having a single unified technical discussion list, and > then > > one or more separate (still mandatory-subscription) lists for > > administrative matters and notifications? If we can get consensus on > > such an approach, it might supersede the need for a survey, but I > will > > try to get the survey out ASAP nonetheless, perhaps including this as > an > > option. > > This proposal got some support and if there was any objections, I > missed > it. This Call for Consensus is intended to determine if there are > indeed any objections. > > So to be clear: the proposal is to create another mailing list and to > redirect the types of discussions described above to that mailing list. > If this call passes, the name of that mailing list would be > determined > by W3C staff, though constructive suggestions are welcome. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please respond by > Wednesday, November 13th, 2012. Positive response is welcome and > silence > will be considered as agreement with the proposal. > > If your comment is an objection, please clearly state that. > > - Sam Ruby >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 19:39:01 UTC