- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 07:40:16 +1100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHp8n2=YvX-+TGbtFToDUgMKPYLycutpdzfK0bqb=0ZO2H4K5Q@mail.gmail.com>
I like the idea of moving administrative matters to another list. Regards, Silvia. On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 10/22/2012 03:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > >> >> I've heard from some that the major objection to using public-html for >> certain technical discussions is not so much the other technical >> discussion, so much as administrative matters that are considered noise. >> Specifically, the things I have heard cited are bugzilla new bug >> notifications, and CFCs and other "call" type emails. How would folks >> feel about having a single unified technical discussion list, and then >> one or more separate (still mandatory-subscription) lists for >> administrative matters and notifications? If we can get consensus on >> such an approach, it might supersede the need for a survey, but I will >> try to get the survey out ASAP nonetheless, perhaps including this as an >> option. >> > > This proposal got some support and if there was any objections, I missed > it. This Call for Consensus is intended to determine if there are indeed > any objections. > > So to be clear: the proposal is to create another mailing list and to > redirect the types of discussions described above to that mailing list. If > this call passes, the name of that mailing list would be determined by W3C > staff, though constructive suggestions are welcome. > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please respond by > Wednesday, November 13th, 2012. Positive response is welcome and silence > will be considered as agreement with the proposal. > > If your comment is an objection, please clearly state that. > > - Sam Ruby > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 20:41:05 UTC