- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 19:04:19 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
On 04/11/12 15:59, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > At the HTML F2F, I was asked to provide rationale for my previously > filed formal objection to the Polyglot Markup specification. Here's what I wrote in my comments on this spec during the may 2011 LC vote: "Implementing myself a content editor for html5 (both serializations), I am still uncertain about the usefulness of this document, in other terms I doubt implementors will refer to this document and really implement tools conformant to it. I think then this document should leave the REC track and become a Note." Of course, I never got an answer. More than a year later, I still don't know why we have that document on the REC track. It's still useless to me as an editor vendor. I then support entirely Lachlan's objection here. </Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 18:05:12 UTC