- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:55:03 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:55:50 UTC
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > Since the document should only document conclusions drawn from normative > statements made elsewhere, the Polyglot document itself should not be > normative, because there's a risk of erroneous conclusions getting held up > as normative and leading to confusion (especially since it's not a given > that change control on te Polyglot document is strictly enough controlled > to avoid errors and since there's a real risk of people asking for > restrictions stricter than the minimal logical consequences from normative > text elsewhere). > +1 (polyglot doc does not need to be REC, but can be NOTE)
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:55:50 UTC