- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 15:42:57 -0400
- To: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- CC: 'Edward O'Connor' <eoconnor@apple.com>, 'Paul Cotton' <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, 'Maciej Stachowiak' <mjs@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org
On 06/27/2012 03:16 PM, John Foliot wrote:
>
> This Apple employee further states that he has no idea on how or what he
> will be hoping to propose as a counter proposal (and in fact is asking if
> anyone else can help him), has not engaged in any dialog around this topic
> prior to yesterday, and now needs 2 additional weeks to bring forward an
> Alternative Change Proposal so that we can then go through the additional
> steps of thrust, {delay} and parry (a.k.a. "online discussion") in an effort
> to avoid a WBS survey; and after that protracted effort is engaged upon, we
> still have a possibility of a WBS Survey.
I object to this characterization. It is expressed in a manner that we
will not tolerate on this list:
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/DiscussionGuidelines
I'll note that you could have made the same point in a professional
manner. Yes, this could delay -- but not avoid -- this issue going to
survey.
> Have I missed anything?
Ted has been asked, by the chairs, to help out on a number of issues;
and when he has done so the results are generally positive. Because we
have prioritized his workload, it made sense to give some latitude on an
issue that we did not include in that prioritization.
> JF
- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2012 19:43:27 UTC