- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:53:32 +0100
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vme+8mQZ_581=K-1C1tAzYyhmoS91FU+oDbRS5LEdY3_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Henri, > Or even better, a boolean option built into the validator's UI. > > That would not address the problem. Let's recap what problem the spec > is trying to address: The spec is trying to remove the incentive for > generator developers to emit empty alt when their generator doesn't > have or logically cannot have proper alternative text it could stick > into alt. If suppressing reporting of missing alt was under the > control of the person who invokes the validator instead of the person > who programs the markup generator, the person who programs the markup > generator would still be incented to make the generator emit empty alt > in order to make the generator always produce valid output so that the > generator appears to be correct in the eyes of people who judge it by > validating its output. > I suggest that a message be provided in the reulsts for pages that include any error suppression in a similar format to this currently displayed in the nu markup service: *Info*: Using the schema for HTML5 + SVG 1.1 + MathML 2.0 + RDFa Lite 1.1 + > Microdata. > for example: *Info*: meta name="alternative_text" content="nowarn" , suppressing missing > alt attribute errors > regards Stevef On 7 June 2012 14:29, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > > This could be a different <meta> element... > > > > <meta name="alternative_text" content="nowarn"> > > This could work. (Work for alt, that is. I don't expect it to be > reasonable to come up with names for all possible aspects of validator > behavior, but I don't expect it to be interesting to suppress > arbitrary validator behaviors.) > > > Or even better, a boolean option built into the validator's UI. > > That would not address the problem. Let's recap what problem the spec > is trying to address: The spec is trying to remove the incentive for > generator developers to emit empty alt when their generator doesn't > have or logically cannot have proper alternative text it could stick > into alt. If suppressing reporting of missing alt was under the > control of the person who invokes the validator instead of the person > who programs the markup generator, the person who programs the markup > generator would still be incented to make the generator emit empty alt > in order to make the generator always produce valid output so that the > generator appears to be correct in the eyes of people who judge it by > validating its output. > > -- > Henri Sivonen > hsivonen@iki.fi > http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com | www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives - dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/ Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 13:54:49 UTC