- From: Alex Giladi <alex.giladi@huawei.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 11:58:56 +0000
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henri, ISO-BMFF is also codec-independent. So what is proposed is support for another codec-independent container that is very widely used in the industry. In general, a codec-specific container is a *terrible* design idea. The motivation is that it makes sense to support the container that broadcasters and operators have their infrastructure built on. I personally don't really care which codec is used, so I intentionally don't want to get into the debate whether MPEG-2 *video* is good/bad/bad patent-wise. Regards, Alex. -----Original Message----- From: hsivonen@gmail.com [mailto:hsivonen@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Henri Sivonen Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 6:52 AM To: public-html WG Subject: Re: MPEG2-TS activity in Bugzilla On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Alex Giladi <alex.giladi@huawei.com> wrote: > It is codec-independent -- it's only concerned with use of MPEG-2 Transport Stream as a container. Right, but usually there is some concrete motivation behind introducing support codec-independent containers. I'm curious what the concrete motivation is.
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 11:59:41 UTC