- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:07:54 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
Hi Sam, I do not anticipate changing the Include longdesc in HTML5 change proposal in response to the Chairs ISSUE-204 decision. FYI: I spoke with Judy today. She and the accessibility task force may be developing further documentation for ISSUE-30 to help ensure that longdesc is included in HTML5. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > At this point issue 204 has gone to survey, seeking objections on two > proposals. > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4 > > In order to help the chairs plan our next steps, I would appreciate some > indication as to whether or not people will be requesting an opportunity to > update their proposals based on the decision, and if so, an estimate as to > how long that would take. > > So regarding the "InstateLongdesc" proposal[1]... > > 1) Should the "AllowAriaReferHidden" proposal be selected, would the > InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if so, how long do you > estimate that it would take? > > 2) Should the "Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4" proposal be selected, > would the InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if so, how long > do you estimate that it would take? > > I want to emphasize that this query is solely for planning purposes and will > not affect the outcome of issue 204. > > The survey on issue 204 closes on Friday August 3rd. A response by that > time would be greatly appreciated. > > - Sam Ruby > > [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections > Resent-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:19:07 +0000 > Resent-From: public-html@w3.org > Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:18:04 +0000 > From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > To: public-html@w3.org <public-html@w3.org> > > > > ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/204 > > The HTML WG has not reached consensus on how to exempt ARIA attributes > from the rule that prohibits reference to hidden elements. > > The poll is available here and it will run through Fri Aug 3: > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-204-objection-poll/ > > Please read the introductory text before entering your response. > > In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only > need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly > strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked > objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone else's > objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and > will not be counting votes. > > /paulc > > HTML WG co-chair > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > > -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 30 July 2012 18:08:24 UTC