- From: Cameron Jones <cmhjones@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:16:11 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On 07/26/2012 11:30 AM, Cameron Jones wrote: >> >> If >> the counter-proposal is not updated then i must assume by inference >> that the concerns have been addressed and an effective consensus has >> been achieved. > > > I disagree. Until and unless a proposal is withdrawn, we don't make that > assumption. > > If you can get the author of the alternate proposal to withdraw his > proposal, we will proceed to a call for consensus on your proposal. If > neither of you withdraw your proposal, we will proceed to a survey, and make > a decision based on the objections presented in response to that survey. > > - Sam Ruby Ok, the stretch from lack of unaddressed objection to consensus is a leap in assumption. If Ted wishes to withdraw his proposal i will leave that up to him to decide on those merits. I find the progression to survey to be a valued one and as such, based on no further developments, i agree with this being the next step. I will be offline for a week from mid-next. I would the time between now and then to go through the proposal once more after which i will confirm the proposal ready for survey. Thanks, Cameron Jones
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2012 16:16:43 UTC