- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:08:05 +0200
- To: "Sunyang (Eric)" <eric.sun@huawei.com>
- Cc: "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Sunyang, A text track is a part of the video and dependent on the video's timeline. Basically, text tracks are sub-resources of the video. A transcript in contrast is a concept in its own right and does not even need a video element to be published. It certainly does not rely on the video's timeline. It is therefore more like a "partner resource" than a "sub-resource". HTH. Cheers, Silvia. On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Sunyang (Eric) <eric.sun@huawei.com> wrote: > What's the difference between textrack in media element and transcript? > They both show some text description of the media. > > Why we need transcript even if we have texttract? > > Yang > Huawei > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Edward O'Connor [mailto:eoconnor@apple.com] >> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 6:07 AM >> To: public-html@w3.org >> Subject: ISSUE-194 >> >> Hi all, >> >> Eric Carlson, John Foliot, Silvia Pfeiffer and I had a call today in >> which we attempted to resolve the remaining differences between our >> ISSUE-194 proposals. Unfortunately, we were unable to come to a >> consensus position. Given this, I will keep both of the following Change >> Proposals on the table for an eventual poll on ISSUE-194: >> >> Defer ISSUE-194 until HTML.next >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-194-6 >> >> Mint a transcript attribute for the programmatic association of >> transcripts with media elements >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-194-2B >> >> >> Thanks, >> Ted > >
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 07:08:52 UTC