Re: 答复: ISSUE-194

Hi Eric,

The choice is between these proposals:

* http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposal/ISSUE-194/TranscriptURL
* http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-194-2B
* http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ISSUE-194/NoChange


On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Sunyang (Eric) <eric.sun@huawei.com> wrote:
> It seems ted mentioned first option 194-6 is
>
> <a rel=transcript href=transcript.html hreflang=en
>    >English language transcript</a>
> <video src=video.mp4></video>
>
> We do not consider about it?

That's indeed the no-change proposal since no new markup is required for it.

HTH.

Regards,
Silvia.


>
> What's more, I think transcript="URL" is better, since we can always link a html or text file using URL, no matter it is on the
> Same server or different server of the page, but using a list of element id seems make page complex.
>
> So I think using URL is better, and what is important difference or rational for 2 options of transcript?
>
>
> Yang Sun
> Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
> Email: eric.sun@huawei.com
> Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
> No 101,Software Avenue, Yuhua District,Nanjing 518129, P.R.China
> http://www.huawei.com
>
> 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁
> 止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中
> 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！
> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which
> is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the
> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial
> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended
> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:mjs@apple.com]
> 发送时间: 2012年6月30日 7:50
> 收件人: Edward O'Connor; Silvia Pfeiffer
> 抄送: public-html@w3.org
> 主题: Re: ISSUE-194
>
>
> Hi Ted & Silvia,
>
> It seems to me that the two transcript attribute proposals are now much closer than our original starting point. They are intended to meet the same requirements and satisfy the same use cases, and have pretty similar syntax and usage.
>
> Currently the proposals at <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposal/ISSUE-194/TranscriptURL> and <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-194-2B> both propose a transcript attribute, one taking a URL, and the other taking a list of element IDs. However, neither provides direct rationale for why its form of the transcript attribute is different from the others. They focus more on why transcript support is useful at all, and on comparing to proposals no longer on the table.
>
> I think it would improve both proposals if they gave rationale for why their form of the transcript attribute is better than the other.
>
> It would be even better if we could reach consensus, given how close the two proposals now are, but I recognize that at some point we need to move on and make a decision if we do not have consensus.
>
> Regards,
> Maciej
>
>
>
> On Jun 29, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Eric Carlson, John Foliot, Silvia Pfeiffer and I had a call today in
>> which we attempted to resolve the remaining differences between our
>> ISSUE-194 proposals. Unfortunately, we were unable to come to a
>> consensus position. Given this, I will keep both of the following Change
>> Proposals on the table for an eventual poll on ISSUE-194:
>>
>>  Defer ISSUE-194 until HTML.next
>>    http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-194-6
>>
>>  Mint a transcript attribute for the programmatic association of
>>  transcripts with media elements
>>    http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Eoconnor/ISSUE-194-2B
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ted
>>
>
>

Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 11:04:41 UTC