- From: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:21:06 -0700
- To: public-html@w3.org
Hi Maciej, You wrote: >> It seems to me that the two transcript attribute proposals are now >> much closer than our original starting point. They are intended to >> meet the same requirements and satisfy the same use cases, and have >> pretty similar syntax and usage. Yup! >> [N]either provides direct rationale for why its form of the >> transcript attribute is different from the others. They focus more on >> why transcript support is useful at all, and on comparing to >> proposals no longer on the table. >> >> I think it would improve both proposals if they gave rationale for >> why their form of the transcript attribute is better than the other. I will update the text of my proposal along such lines. Silvia wrote: > I've still got a TODO to improve the TranscriptURL proposal with some > language that compares it to the IDREFs proposal with > advantages/disadvantages. […] You can expect something before the end > of the week. I'll aim to have my updates done by the end of the week as well. Ted
Received on Monday, 2 July 2012 18:21:38 UTC