- From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
- Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:12:58 +0100
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F4D6D8A.9020708@kosek.cz>
On 28.2.2012 19:34, Sam Ruby wrote: > Before we proceed to evaluate this Change Proposal, can we ask that you > spell out the specifics of "Analogic edit has to be done in sections > "4.2.5.4 Other pragma directives" and "4.12.4.14 Other link types"? Sure, in 4.2.5.4 change "Conformance checkers must use the information given on the WHATWG Wiki PragmaExtensions page to establish if a value is allowed or not: values defined in this specification or listed on the aforementioned page must be accepted, whereas values not listed in either this specification or on the aforementioned page must be rejected as invalid. Conformance checkers may cache this information (e.g. for performance reasons or to avoid the use of unreliable network connectivity)." to "Conformance checkers *may* use the information given on the WHATWG Wiki PragmaExtensions page to establish if a value is allowed or not: values defined in this specification or listed on the aforementioned page must be accepted, whereas values not listed in either this specification or on the aforementioned page must be *reported* as invalid. Conformance checkers may cache this information (e.g. for performance reasons or to avoid the use of unreliable network connectivity)." in 4.12.4.14 change "Conformance checkers must use the information given on the microformats wiki existing-rel-values page to establish if a value is allowed or not: values defined in this specification or marked as "proposed" or "ratified" must be accepted when used on the elements for which they apply as described in the "Effect on..." field, whereas values marked as "discontinued" or not listed in either this specification or on the aforementioned page must be rejected as invalid. Conformance checkers may cache this information (e.g. for performance reasons or to avoid the use of unreliable network connectivity)." to "Conformance checkers *may* use the information given on the microformats wiki existing-rel-values page to establish if a value is allowed or not: values defined in this specification or marked as "proposed" or "ratified" must be accepted when used on the elements for which they apply as described in the "Effect on..." field, whereas values marked as "discontinued" or not listed in either this specification or on the aforementioned page must be *reported* as invalid. Conformance checkers may cache this information (e.g. for performance reasons or to avoid the use of unreliable network connectivity)." Sorry for not being explict from the start -- as a non-native English speaker I probably had wrong impression what "analogic edit" means. Have a nice day, Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 00:13:24 UTC