- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:48:11 -0500
- To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- CC: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
On 02/26/2012 08:12 AM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > > If not, I'll guess I'll need to ask the Chairs what textual changes > they would require to HTML WG deliverables if they accepted the > proposal and decide how to proceed on the basis of their > interpretation. I just want to remind everybody that the current state of the issue is closed. The goal of the current discussion is to determine whether or not to reopen the issue on the basis of New Information. To date, this request has been made twice: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0139.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0299.html And both times, the chairs have not found sufficient new information to merit reopening the issue: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Feb/0121.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0293.html I do believe that this discussion has identified a number of additional items that those who might want to submit this request a third time should seriously consider addressing before they choose to do so. - Sam Ruby
Received on Sunday, 26 February 2012 13:48:45 UTC