- From: John C. Vernaleo <john@netpurgatory.com>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:02:34 -0500 (EST)
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- cc: Andreas Kuckartz <A.Kuckartz@ping.de>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Glenn Adams wrote: > The issue isn't whether it can be implemented in open source software (it > can), the issue is whether encrypted content can be decoded and presented to > a user on a device that uses such implementation while simultaneously > satisfying further constraints imposed by licensing terms by content > providers who insist on using content protection with acceptable impediments > to unauthorized access. > If such content providers cannot be assured of such protection, then they > may not make the content available through such means. Saying that something can be implemented but not be used seems to be a very odd definition of implementing to me.
Received on Saturday, 25 February 2012 17:02:53 UTC