On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:17 PM, John C. Vernaleo <john@netpurgatory.com>wrote: > Which part is baloney? The part where deaf people get to enjoy >> Hamlet, or the part where English professors get to critique it? >> >> >> the part where DRM/content protection is equated with intentionally >> denying access to impaired users >> >> >> the argument ian is making is akin to saying that use of https is >> intentionally denying access to hackers >> >> >> > Other than disagreeing with your use of the word hacker, isn't that > exactly why most people use https? sorry, wrong analogy on my part, i should have said denying access to impaired users; the point is that DRM/CP has nothing to do with content access with respect to impaired usersReceived on Friday, 24 February 2012 22:21:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:20 UTC