Re: ISSUE-200: legend-placement - Chairs Solicit Proposals

Thank you. Here is my change proposal for LEGEND element:

http://www.w3.org/wiki/User:Mtanalin/legend-placement



22.02.2012, 00:10, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
> On 02/20/2012 07:45 PM, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
>
>> šThanks for clarification. Well, if it's required for considering the
>> šissue at all, I would like to try to create proposal in nearest 2-3
>> šdays (this may be treated as my request to extend period for issue
>> š200). Thanks.
>
> That's fine. šI'll change the status of the issue back to raised, and
> set a new deadline for the 26th of February.
>
>> šP.S. To make it more clear for future tracker requests by others, it
>> šmaybe makes sense to specify formal-proposal requirement briefly
>> šright inside _mailing-list message_ created once issue is raised.
>> šDecision-policy document, while maybe formally sufficient, seems to
>> šbe too verbose and not enough clear for third-party people who raise
>> šissues for the first time (like me). Thanks.
>
> We already do calls for proposals and make it clear what the
> consequences are if we don't receive such a proposal. šIf you think
> something more is needed, please open a bug report on the process:
>
> šššhttp://tinyurl.com/6bpw9pq
>
> - Sam Ruby
>
>> š21.02.2012, 04:29, "Sam Ruby"<rubys@intertwingly.net>:
>>> šOn 02/20/2012 07:06 PM, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
>>>> šCould you specify what does this mean? What change proposals are
>>>> šassumed? From who? Isn't raising issue itself a sufficient action
>>>> šby bug-reporter? Thanks.
>>> šHere's a description of what is expected in a change proposal:
>>>
>>> šhttp://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#change-proposal
>
> Somebody needs to provide the summary, rationale, proposal details, and
>
>>> ševaluate the impact of the proposed change. šIf those had been
>>> šprovided, we would ask for alternate or counter proposals.
>>> šRequests that do not provide this information are deferred to
>>> šwhatever might happen to come after HTML5.
>>>
>>> šIf somebody plans to work on this, and needs a small extension,
>>> šthey should make a request now. šThe longer it goes, the less
>>> šlikely the chairs are to grant such an extension.
>>>
>>> š- Sam Ruby
>>>> š21.02.2012, 03:56, "Sam Ruby"<rubys@intertwingly.net>:
>>>>> šOn 01/17/2012 09:49 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>>>>>> š'Allow wrapping LEGEND (or new iLEGEND) in non-FIELDSET
>>>>>> šelements'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> šPer the HTML WG Decision Policy, at this time the chairs
>>>>>> šwould like to solicit volunteers to write Change Proposals
>>>>>> šfor ISSUE-200:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> šhttp://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/200
>>>>>> šhttp://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation
>
> If no Change Proposals are written by February 16th, 2012, this
>
>>>>>> šissue will be closed without prejudice.
>>>>> šAs we have received no change proposals, we are now marking
>>>>> šthis issue as closed without prejudice.
>>>>>> šIssue status link:
>>>>>> šhttp://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-200
>>>>>>
>>>>>> š/paulc HTML WG co-chair
>>>>>>
>>>>>> šPaul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa,
>>>>>> šOntario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>>>>> š- Sam Ruby

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 23:30:38 UTC