W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Encrypted Media proposal (was RE: ISSUE-179: av_param - Chairs Solicit Alternate Proposals or Counter-Proposals)

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:23:01 -0800
Message-ID: <4F4594F5.5000304@jumis.com>
To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, "HTML WG (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
On 2/21/2012 3:16 PM, Adrian Bateman wrote:
> We'd like to get people's feedback on the proposal. It is posted here:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html
> Many content providers and application developers have said they can't use<audio>
> and<video>  because HTML lacks robust content protection. Without this functionality,

Well I'm certainly hoping this brings Netflix another step closer to HTML5.

Would you switch over to using async XHR in the Examples? It's a pain, 
but that's the way it is.

For encryption (vs. "content protection"), I'd like to see something 
like this supported:

I can easily handle stream encryption on array buffers, so that I'm not 
locked into whatever is implemented in the encrypted-media API.

Keep in mind, these can all still work great with audio and video 

We are very close to a full, robust and programmable API chain for 
audio-video content.

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 01:23:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:48 UTC