W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Split Issue 30?

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:43:05 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOavpvci=zR_Tqn-GMSjFd63hi-1jEaDFduj+qr7=jVEQfLLYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Hi Leif,

> Well, OK, to the Chairs, then unique use cases for
> @longdesc seems to be crucial.

I reject the notion that providing unique use cases that *only*
longdesc can fulfill is to be the deciding factor for including
longdesc in the language.

If I misunderstood the original decision and this is the intent and
will be the determining factor, perhaps a Formal Objection should have
been made after the first decision on that basis instead of the

longdesc is a useful attribute in and of itself.

Best Regards,
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 17:43:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:45:48 UTC