W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2012

Re: CfC: Close ISSUE-150 code-point-verbosity by Amicable Resolution

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:44:31 -0400
Message-ID: <50356EDF.4060809@intertwingly.net>
To: julian.reschke@gmx.de
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Julian: as there is now an editor's draft that reflects the results of 
the script that Mike produced to address this issue, can you verify that 
it meets what you were looking for?  If not, can you identify what more 
needs to be done?

http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/

- Sam Ruby

On 07/13/2011 11:10 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:
>> If no objections are raised to this call by July 12th 2011, we will direct the editor to make the proposed change.
>
> At this time, we find that we have consensus on the following proposal for ISSUE-150:
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0120.html
>
> Bug 11124 will be REOPENED and marked as WGDecision.  Once the editor has made the change, ISSUE-150 will be CLOSED.
>
> /paulc
> On behalf of the HTML WG Chairs
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 5:20 PM
> To: public-html@w3.org
> Subject: CfC: Close ISSUE-150 code-point-verbosity by Amicable Resolution
>
>> ISSUE-150 code-point-verbosity - "consider reducing verbosity when talking about code points"
>>
>> The current status of ISSUE-150 is as follows:
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/150
>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-150
>>
>> We have a single Change Proposal to "reduce verbosity without losing precision":
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0120.html
>
>> At this time the WG Chairs would like to solicit alternate Change Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details), in case anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different change than the specific one in the existing Change Proposal.
>>
>> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by July 1st, 2011, we will proceed to evaluate the change proposal that we have received to date for ISSUE-150.
>
> As we have received no counter-proposals or alternate proposals, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on the proposal that we do have.
>
> If no objections are raised to this call by July 12th 2011, we will direct the editor to make the proposed change.  If anybody would like to raise an objection during this time, we strongly encourage them to accompany their objection with a concrete and complete change proposal.
>
> /paulc
> HTML WG co-chair
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 23:45:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:26 UTC