Re: CR exit criteria and features at risk for HTML5

On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:50 PM, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca> wrote:

> Steve Faulkner wrote
>> 
>> hi Maciej, 
>> (2) The strict version requires that implementations used to prove
>> interoperability must be public, but must not be experimental (they
>> can be betas, nightlies, developer previews or the like); the permissive
>> version allows non-public or purely experimental implementations to 
>> be cited.
>> 
>> don't like the idea of allowing  " non-public or purely experimental
>> implementations to be cited." 
> 
> +1 there. 
> 
> At a minimum I think that a publicly available beta would be a reasonable
> cut-off line.

The "strict" version does allow publicly available betas and the like. I'm curious whether anyone supports allowing non-public or experimental builds. I'll also check whether those who suggested this feel strongly about it.

 - Maciej

Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 17:22:30 UTC