HTML5 bug triage categories, actions and priorities

• From: Erika Doyle Navara <Erika.Doyle@microsoft.com>
• Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:01:27 +0000
• To: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <C2EBB6888A6186438E656BD1976ED0B63A05DA@TK5EX14MBXW601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.>

Hi all,

Before we start processing the backlog of HTML5 bugs, the editors would like to propose the following bug categories, actions and priorities:

1. spam
 -> resolve as invalid (no priority)

2. comments on LC1 bugs
-> mark as LC2 bugs and P2 or P3

3. minor editorial bugs
-> mark as editorial bugs and P4

4. technical problems
-> discuss and mark with P2 or P3 unless there was a PriorityRequest
by submitter, then P1

5. new features
-> mark as HTML.next bugs (no priority)

6. other (duplicates, bugs specific to whatwg formatting, canvas and polyglot spec bugs)
-> resolve as duplicate / invalid / moved as appropriate (no priority)

If there are no objections, we will move forward with the bug triage.

Thanks,
Erika Doyle Navara

Received on Wednesday, 15 August 2012 10:02:32 UTC