- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 04:19:00 +0100
- To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > The information that an image contains important content, but does not have an alt is not already > provided in the accessibility tree Sorry? When a developer knows an image does not contain important content, they can use alt="" and it will not be exposed to the accessibility hierarchy. Equally when a developer does not know the alternative text for an image, they can omit alt and it *will* be exposed to the accessibility hierarchy. AFAICT we don't need to add new HTML features or accessibility mappings or AT behaviours for these cases. The question in this thread is whether we should add a feature to suppress/minimize linter warnings when a developer does not provide an @alt because they don't know alternative text in order not to encourage them, for example, to mislabel the image as *not* containing important content via alt="". That's all. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2012 03:19:50 UTC